Discussion Feed

Satish.Shettar

Hello Team,. We have an application which is producing several BTs. And some BTs are returning with errors codes and response code with 404, 408 and 422 with various response codes. which is fine. But there are some errors which comes with certain response codes which we would like to mark is at "Not Error". Following table has some sample data where the error with respective response code should be treated as "Not Error" or "Successful/Valid Transaction" HTTP CODE TYPE APPLICATION RESPONSE CODE 404 ERROR 304 408 ERROR 305 422 ERROR 306 422 ERROR 307 422 ERROR 308

Satish.Shettar · ‎12-09-2019

The requirement is to get the count of the errors for the requested time of interval(some application request 30 minutes and some 360 minutes) We tried to achieve this using the metric "Errors per minute", but the validation is not getting performed appropriately due to the limitation of predefined value 30 minutes. In the business transaction window, we see a metric "Total number of Errors", but the same is not available in the health-rules metric list to select and use it for configuring. Kindly let us know if there is an alternate method to achieve this.

Satish.Shettar · ‎12-08-2019

Hi Mark.. So to confirm your problem, you are still getting URLs appearing in a Business Transaction called "Broker", even though you have deleted the rule called "Broker"? - Yes Or are they appearing in Business Transactions named after their URL, as I would still expect the Auto-discovery to discover URLs that do not have either /brk/v0/list/provider/list.json or /brk/v0/services in them (assuming that the priority of the Auto discovery rule is lower than 141)? - True, The priority of the Auto discovery is less than 141

Satish.Shettar · ‎12-08-2019

Hello Mark, Thank you for your response. Yes, Initially the auto discovery rule was having default setting to capture only two URI parts. And the configured URI was common in both the transactions detection rules, Using the same details the transaction detection rules were configured. But inside the BT, it was found two URLs being captured with difference in 3rd and 4th part of URI, and the Developer wanted to have it seperately. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The following Settings are of the Transaction detection rule which we deleted: Summary: Rule Type : Custom Match Rule Include/Exclude : Include Transactions discovered by this rule Agent Type : Java Entry Point Type : Servlet Name : Broker Enabled : Yes Priority : 141 Description : Scope : <Application_Name> Rule Configuration HTTP Request Match Criteria URI : Contains : /brk/v0/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Now, the Java Auto Discovery Rule was created for this application with URI parts detection settings as 5. Initially we have updated the existing transaction and then deleted and created the new transaction detection rule as follows Summary: Rule Type : Custom Match Rule Include/Exclude : Include Transactions discovered by this rule Agent Type : Java Entry Point Type : Servlet Name : Broker - CHN Enabled : Yes Priority : 141 Description : Scope : <Application_Name> Rule Configuration HTTP Request Match Criteria URI : Contains : /brk/v0/list/provider/list.json ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An additional transaction detection rule which was created along with other transaction detection rule as follows: Summary: Rule Type : Custom Match Rule Include/Exclude : Include Transactions discovered by this rule Agent Type : Java Entry Point Type : Servlet Name : Broker Feature Enabled : Yes Priority : 150 Description : Scope : <Application_Name> Rule Configuration HTTP Request Match Criteria URI : Contains : /brk/v0/services ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hope the above information helps.

Satish.Shettar · ‎12-06-2019

Hello Team,. I have created a Include Business Transaction(Broker) Detection while the auto discovery servlet naming was configured to 2 URI Parts. One BT started capturing two URLs. I wanted to create two BTs for each URL(Broker-MNO & BROKER CDF). Now I am modifying the existing BT Transaction detection rule as Broker-MNO and creating one more along with, Broker CDF, to capture two different values in two BTs. Still the BT is getting created as "Broker" in business transaction section. Even after deleting the BTs detected before, but still new BTs are appearing as "Broker" and has two URLs in it. Then increased the URI part detection in naming configuration of servelet to 5 and completely deleted both the BT detection Rules. Created two new rules separately as (Broker-MNO & BROKER CDF), still two URLs are capturing in the BT called "Broker" itself. How to get it fixed. Thanks & Best Regards,. Satish Shettar

Satish.Shettar · ‎07-12-2018

We are planning to deploy the agent as a sidecar to monitor multiple micro services. Whether we should consider the same algorithm to do the calculation and propose the sizing.? How many micro services could be configured for an agent deployed as a sidecar.? Do we have an option to configure or restrict the resource consumption for the agent configured as a sidecar.?

Satish.Shettar · ‎07-12-2018

Team,. We have to deploy and configure AppD agents to monitor multiple microservices as a sidecar. How much resources would be consumed by the agent, i.e. CPU and Memory.? Kindly share the limitation and algorithm to calculate based on the number of microservices we could go for. Thanks and best regards., Satish Shettar.

Date Registered	‎06-01-2018 08:59 AM
Date Last Visited	2 weeks ago
Total Messages Posted	7
Total Kudos Received	1

Discussion Feed

Configuring error detection to classify errors as ...

Health Rule to capture the count of errors.

Re: Business Transaction Detection Rule Deletion.

Re: Business Transaction Detection Rule Deletion.

Business Transaction Detection Rule Deletion.

Re: How to measure Agent memory consumption

Resource consumption of AppD agent as Sidecar